Citegrade vs Peec AI: editor vs monitor for AI search visibility
Peec AI tells you if you're cited. Citegrade tells you which paragraph to rewrite to change the answer. Here's the full feature, pricing, and fit breakdown.
Profound pricing per tryprofound.com/pricing (verified August 2026). Peec AI does not publish pricing.
TL;DR: Peec AI is a monitoring platform trusted by 2,000+ marketing teams including Breitling, Hugo Boss, Attio, Squarespace, ElevenLabs, and Wix. It tracks whether AI models mention your brand, with four tiers: Starter (50 prompts, 1 project), Pro (150 prompts, 2 projects), Advanced (350 prompts, 5 projects, multi-country), and Custom Enterprise. Peec does not publish prices publicly — you start a trial or talk to sales. Citegrade is a page-level editor. It audits your pages across 7 citation-readiness dimensions, flags paragraph-level blockers, and generates one-click rewrites — starting free, scaling to $9.99/mo. Peec tells you if you're cited. Citegrade tells you what to change.
To answer the most common question directly: if you need to monitor brand visibility across AI engines, pick Peec AI. If you need to fix the pages that are costing you citations, pick Citegrade. For SaaS founders and indie website owners who want the shortest path to being cited, the editor does more than the monitor.
The core difference: editor vs monitor
Both tools exist because traditional SEO tools don't answer the question AI-era owners actually ask: “why isn't ChatGPT citing my page?” They answer it differently.
| Approach | What the tool does | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Peec AI (monitor) | Runs thousands of prompts against ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and Google AI Overviews. Scrapes which brands and URLs get mentioned. Builds dashboards over time. | Visibility trends, share-of-voice data, cited-source lists, competitor benchmarks |
| Citegrade (editor) | Opens your page at paragraph-level. Scores 7 dimensions. Flags vague claims, buried answers, weak headings, and stale data. Generates before/after rewrites. | A prioritized issue list, one-click editorial fixes, CMS-ready output, direct citation verification in ChatGPT and Perplexity |
Our review of third-party citation studies suggests that clear, self-contained passages are useful to test. That research was not conducted by Citegrade and does not establish a guaranteed lift. A monitor measures visibility; an editor helps revise the page. Choose the job you're hiring for.
Full feature comparison
| Feature | Peec AI | Citegrade |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI visibility monitoring | AI citation editor |
| Free tier | — | Free — 2 audits/month |
| Entry paid | Starter — 50 prompts, 1 project, 3 models | $2.99/mo Pro — 30 page audits, unlimited rewrites |
| Mid | Pro — 150 prompts, 2 projects, 3 models | — |
| Upper | Advanced — 350 prompts, 5 projects, multi-country | $9.99/mo Scale — 120 page audits, unlimited rewrites, dedicated support |
| Top | Custom Enterprise — all models, unlimited projects, API, SSO | — |
| Unit of work | Prompts tracked per month across AI engines | Full page audits with generated rewrites |
| Engines monitored | Choose 3 of major LLMs per tier; all models on Enterprise | ChatGPT + Perplexity citation verification per query |
| Multi-country tracking | Advanced tier and above | Global query testing (not per-country aggregates) |
| Users per plan | Unlimited on all tiers | Single-user workspace; native team workflows planned |
| Page-level issue detection | Not primary focus (monitoring platform) | Yes — 7 dimensions, paragraph-level |
| One-click rewrites | Not primary focus (monitoring platform) | Yes — unlimited on Pro/Scale |
| Before / after diff | Not primary focus (monitoring platform) | Yes |
| CMS push | Not primary focus (monitoring platform) | Markdown/HTML export; native CMS connections planned |
| API access | Enterprise tier only | Planned, not currently available |
| Notable customers | Breitling, Hugo Boss, Attio, Squarespace, Brevo, n8n, ElevenLabs, TUI Group, Wix (2,000+ marketing teams) | SaaS founders, indie brands, small agencies |
| Funding | $21M Series A (Nov 2025, $100M+ valuation) | Independent / bootstrapped |
| Best for | Marketing teams that need multi-engine, multi-project share-of-voice | SaaS founders, indie brands, agencies fixing specific pages |
When Peec AI is the right fit
Peec AI is the better pick when any of these apply:
- You operate across multiple countries and need geographic visibility data
- You need to report share-of-voice trends to stakeholders monthly
- Your team is 5+ people and you need unlimited seats without per-user pricing
- You care more about knowing where you're mentioned than changing whether you're mentioned
- Your content pipeline already has writers and editors — you just need diagnostics to feed them
Peec's customer list — Breitling, Hugo Boss, Attio, Squarespace, Brevo, n8n, ElevenLabs, TUI Group, Wix — signals who the product is sold to: serious marketing teams at established brands with existing content ops, not solo founders building a 20-page SaaS site.
When Citegrade is the right fit
Citegrade is the better pick when any of these apply:
- You have a small team (or are the team) and want the tool to do the editing, not just the diagnosis
- You publish pages on Webflow, WordPress, or a headless CMS and can copy or export improved content into that workflow
- Budget matters and you want to start at $0 to validate before paying
- You want to close the loop: scan → fix → verify citation → measure — inside one tool
- You care more about being cited than about dashboards showing your visibility over time
Citegrade's Free plan gives you 2 audits per month with full 7-dimension scoring and 2 rewrites per audit — no credit card. Most SaaS founders learn in the first free audit whether the tool fits their workflow. See a sample report before signing up.
Can you use both together?
Yes — the two tools are complementary, not substitutable. A credible stack for a mid-size team:
- Peec AI for monitoring: weekly/monthly tracking of whether your brand shows up across AI engines and countries.
- Citegrade for editing: when Peec surfaces that you're losing share of voice on a query, Citegrade audits the associated landing page and generates the rewrite.
- Close the loop: publish the rewrite, re-verify citation status in Citegrade, and monitor Peec's dashboard for any change over time.
For indie SaaS teams or small agencies under $200/month total tooling budget, Citegrade alone typically covers the workflow — its built-in citation verification handles the “am I cited?” question for the queries you actually care about.
Pricing compared
| Plan | Peec AI | Citegrade |
|---|---|---|
| Free | — | $0 — 2 audits/mo, 7-dimension scoring, 2 AI rewrites per audit, citation verification |
| Entry paid | Starter — 50 prompts, 1 project, 3 models, unlimited users, daily tracking | $2.99/mo Pro — 30 page audits, unlimited rewrites, before/after diff, priority support |
| Mid | Pro — 150 prompts, 2 projects, 3 models, unlimited users, daily tracking | — |
| Upper | Advanced — 350 prompts, 5 projects, 3 models, multi-country, unlimited users, daily tracking | $9.99/mo Scale — 120 page audits, unlimited rewrites, dedicated support |
| Top | Custom Enterprise — fully customisable prompt tracking, all models, unlimited projects, daily or weekly frequency, API, SSO, dedicated support | — |
The dollars aren't directly comparable because the units aren't: Peec counts prompts tracked per month across AI engines; Citegrade counts full page audits with generated rewrites. Peec Starter monitors 50 prompts in one project, at a price Peec does not publish. At $2.99/mo Citegrade Pro runs 30 full page audits with unlimited rewrites. Pick based on the job you're hiring the tool to do — measurement or editing.
Agency use cases
Agencies often need both sides. A typical setup:
- Monitoring client deliverable: Peec AI for monthly share-of-voice reports across engines and regions the client cares about.
- Implementation deliverable: Citegrade Scale ($9.99/mo) for auditing client pages, generating rewrites, and exporting Markdown or HTML. Its 120 scans/month supports higher-volume editorial workflows.
- Workflow layer: Move exported recommendations into the agency's existing CMS and reporting process. Native API and white-label automation are planned.
Bottom line: Peec AI and Citegrade solve adjacent problems. Peec monitors visibility over time; Citegrade diagnoses and revises individual pages. Choose the one that matches the next job, or pair them when you need both reporting and editorial work. Run a free Citegrade audit to see the editorial side in action.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Citegrade or Peec AI better for a 30-page SaaS site?
- Choose based on the job. Peec AI monitors brand visibility across markets; Citegrade audits individual pages, flags editorial issues, and generates revisions to test. Use Citegrade for page-level editing and Peec for broader longitudinal monitoring.
- Do I need both Peec AI and Citegrade?
- Not necessarily. Use Peec AI if you need multi-engine, multi-country brand monitoring. Use Citegrade to audit and revise individual pages, then test whether selected citation results change. Teams that need both share-of-voice reporting and page-level editing can pair them.
- How does Peec AI's pricing compare to Citegrade?
- Peec AI does not publish its pricing; Citegrade starts free, with Pro at $2.99/mo. A dollar comparison would be misleading anyway because the units differ — Peec measures prompts tracked across AI engines, Citegrade measures full page audits with rewrites. Peec publishes four tiers — Starter, Pro, Advanced and Custom Enterprise — scaling from 1 to 5 projects, but lists no prices publicly. Citegrade tiers: Free (2 audits/mo), Pro $2.99/mo (30 audits, unlimited rewrites), Scale $9.99/mo (120 audits and dedicated support).
- Why did Peec AI raise $21M?
- Peec AI closed its $21M Series A in November 2025 at a $100M+ valuation, reportedly the fastest funding trajectory of any platform in the AI-visibility category after reaching €650K ARR within 4 months of launch. The round validated the monitoring category for growth-stage teams — which makes Peec a serious player, but doesn't change the core job-to-be-done split between monitoring and editing.
- Can Peec AI fix my page for me?
- No. Peec AI is a monitoring platform — it shows you if AI models mention your brand, which sources they cite, and how your visibility trends over time. It does not open your page, flag vague paragraphs, or generate before/after rewrites. For the editorial layer, you need an editor tool like Citegrade.
- Does Citegrade track brand mentions across multiple AI engines?
- Citegrade verifies citations in ChatGPT and Perplexity per query. For full multi-engine brand-mention tracking (Gemini, Claude, Google AI Overviews, and regional variants), Peec AI's monitoring coverage is broader.
- Which tool is better for agencies managing multiple client sites?
- It depends on the job. Peec AI is designed for multi-client visibility monitoring; Citegrade Scale provides 120 monthly page audits, unlimited rewrites, Markdown/HTML exports, and dedicated support for higher-volume editorial work. Native team, API, and white-label workflows are planned rather than available today.